Map accounts before grouping procurement
Decision pointIllinois meterOhio meter
Official referenceICC utility and choice informationPUCO commercial category
Bill dataUtility, class, kWh and demandUtility, class, kWh and demand
Contract reviewState/entity-specific documentsState/entity-specific documents
Budget testEnergy plus applicable demand and deliveryEnergy plus applicable demand and delivery

Identify the utility before the supplier list

Illinois’ commission distinguishes distribution utilities and alternative retail suppliers. Ohio’s shopping chart asks for the utility and commercial rate category. Start with the delivery utility named on the bill rather than a nearby city name, a state map or a supplier’s general service-area statement.

Keep electricity and natural gas eligibility separate. A procurement process for one commodity does not establish that the other has identical account rules or supplier options. For leased sites, determine whether the tenant or landlord controls each meter; that authority can be more consequential than a small difference between modeled supply prices.

Read the baseline and component treatment

Find the current applicable utility supply arrangement, where available, and its scheduled changes. A small-customer default reference should not be applied to an unrelated large-load class. Request supplier offers with the same start dates, term and consumption assumptions, then identify every included or passed-through component.

A national supplier can use state-specific agreements and entities. Confirm which seller would sign for each meter, and retain the relevant terms rather than assuming a single corporate presentation governs all accounts. Ask how a site addition or closure affects the portfolio contract and whether one location’s default can affect the others.

Hypothetical shared-budget exercise

Suppose an Illinois plant and an Ohio plant each forecast 800,000 kWh, but the Illinois site has a 250 kW billed demand and the Ohio site 400 kW. At an invented $10 per kW demand component for twelve comparable periods, the demand allowances are $30,000 and $48,000.

Those numbers are not actual tariffs or state averages. They show why identical energy consumption does not make the two bills equivalent. A supplier energy-rate comparison alone would miss the $18,000 modeled demand difference. Review the actual tariff and interval profile before attributing a cost gap to Illinois or Ohio market conditions.

Use the comparison to assign work

Maintain separate utility/rate-class fields, supplier end dates and notice terms. Coordinate quote requests where useful, but do not force identical pricing structures on accounts with different operational exposure. A continuous-process plant may need a different review from a lightly occupied office even within the same state.

After an authorized change, reconcile supplier and utility billing to the accepted terms. Track consumption and cost separately so higher spending can be explained. This guide does not select a state, provider or product. It supplies a practical method for comparing documented account opportunities without turning state labels into unsupported savings claims.

Questions & answers

Can the same annual kWh justify the same rate assumptions?

No. Demand, hourly shape, voltage, tariff class, location, term and included components can differ.

Sources & scope

Primary references reviewed October 15, 2026. These sources support the stated concepts; actual tariffs, program rules and signed agreements govern the account. Decision examples and operational worksheets are original educational analysis.