| Decision point | Spark offer | TXU offer |
|---|---|---|
| Eligibility | Current commercial ESI-ID-specific offer | Current commercial ESI-ID-specific offer |
| Rate scope | Energy plus fees and delivery treatment | Energy plus fees and delivery treatment |
| Load assumptions | Actual kWh and demand profile | Actual kWh and demand profile |
| Physical network | Applicable TDU continues delivery | Applicable TDU continues delivery |
Begin with the ESI ID and business load
Confirm that the address is in an applicable competitive area and identify its transmission/distribution utility. Collect twelve months of kWh, measured and billed demand and interval data where available. A small storefront, warehouse and multi-shift plant can require different pricing information even in the same utility territory.
Use the actual commercial product. Residential average-price examples, bill credits and promotional terms may not describe a business contract. Obtain written account eligibility and the seller’s current legal name. If only one channel supplies a qualifying offer, report that result instead of inventing a comparable second plan.
Compare energy and delivery treatment together
Ask whether the rate includes a defined delivery assumption, passes current TDU charges through or applies a different stated formula. Identify recurring fees, demand-related components and any usage conditions. The utility network remains the delivery provider regardless of which retail seller is chosen.
Use the same contract start and duration for both proposals. Review material load changes, move/closure terms and renewal provisions. An advertised energy rate may not reflect the contract’s full commitment or the account’s actual monthly shape. Request a worked bill for the relevant usage and demand rather than compare isolated promotional numbers.
Hypothetical monthly component example
Suppose a business uses 30,000 kWh. An invented energy rate of $0.085 produces $2,550, with another $1,200 of explicitly modeled delivery and other charges for $3,750 total. A second energy rate of $0.083 plus a $100 monthly fee and the same $1,200 scope produces $3,790.
These are hypothetical numbers, not Spark or TXU offers or TDU charges. They show that a lower supply rate can be offset by a recurring fee. If delivery treatment differs, it must be reconciled separately. Do not project the selected month across a year without examining actual seasonal use and billed demand.
Questions & answers
Does a retail provider change replace Oncor or CenterPoint?
No ordinary retail switch changes the network serving the service point. Identify the delivery utility separately.
Sources & scope
Primary references reviewed October 15, 2026. These sources support the stated concepts; actual tariffs, program rules and signed agreements govern the account. Decision examples and operational worksheets are original educational analysis.
- Spark Energy: Official website
Current supplier-facing site, not an account-level offer or approval. - TXU Energy: Business Electricity
Current Texas business-facing channel and Vistra relationship. Promotional terms are not reproduced. - Oncor: Delivery Charges 101
Distinction between the retail electric provider and transmission/distribution utility. - DOE FEMP: Evaluating Your Utility Rate Options
Energy, demand and fixed charges and why the complete tariff matters.
