Wholesale reform came before many retail programs

Federal policy gradually expanded opportunities for independent generation and wholesale transactions. FERC’s Order 888, issued in 1996, addressed open access to interstate electricity transmission and barriers to wholesale competition. That did not automatically give every restaurant, office, or factory the right to choose a retail supplier. State legislatures and commissions determined much of the retail structure, while local utility arrangements remained significant. An old restructuring date is therefore background, not proof of current account eligibility.

Natural gas followed its own restructuring path

Gas reforms separated pipeline transportation from commodity sales. FERC’s historical account describes Order 636 in 1992 as a major unbundling step for interstate pipeline service. Local customer-choice programs subsequently developed under different state and utility frameworks, with many beginning during the 1990s. Larger industrial transportation arrangements also predate some mass-market programs. A building may consequently have competitive gas options even where its electricity remains bundled, or a gas transportation tariff with responsibilities beyond a typical small-business choice plan.

Retail decisions produced a patchwork

Some jurisdictions developed broad supplier-choice programs, while others retained bundled utility supply or limited access. Participation caps, utility ownership, customer size, and program conditions can constrain the practical options. Michigan, for example, has a statutory cap that can create a queue. Municipal utilities and cooperatives may operate differently from neighboring utilities. Historical state maps often flatten these distinctions. Procurement should use current regulator and utility information, with old articles clearly treated as historical evidence.

Practical example: an inherited company policy

Imagine a company handbook written after a state’s initial restructuring. It says all locations should renew competitive electricity contracts every two years. A newly acquired municipal-utility location may not fit that instruction, and another account may face a capped program. Update the handbook around account-level eligibility, current tariffs, and signed contract obligations. Preserve the old rule’s budget-control purpose while replacing its assumption that one historical legal change created identical options for every site.

Practical review checklist

  • Distinguish federal wholesale reform dates from state retail program implementation dates.
  • Check current utility and regulator sources before applying an old state market map to a meter.
  • Document electricity and gas arrangements separately when acquiring or opening business locations.
  • Review legacy sourcing policies when utility ownership, laws, tariffs, or account classes change.

Questions & answers

Did Order 888 deregulate every retail electric bill?

No. It addressed interstate wholesale transmission access; retail supply choice depends on separate state and utility arrangements.

Why do older articles give different numbers of choice states?

Dates, fuel types, customer classes, and definitions of limited versus broad choice differ. Use the relevant current program rules.

Sources & scope

Primary references reviewed October 15, 2026. These sources support the stated concepts; actual tariffs, program rules and signed agreements govern the account. Decision examples and operational worksheets are original educational analysis.